Author Archive

Tips for Twitter Chats

January 18, 2012

With the release of Humanize, I’ve been invited to be a part of several new Twitter Chats. I’m starting to really enjoy them, though they do have their limitations. A twitter chat is made up of three things: a hashtag, a specific time, and a host. In the association world, the primary chat is the weekly #assnchat, hosted by Kiki L’Italien (yes, for those of you who are new, it is actually called #assnchat, which stands for Association Chat). It’s Tuesdays at 2pm. At that time Kiki starts tweeting, adding #assnchat to her tweets so people can start following the conversation through a twitter search. Other twitter chats I’ve been following lately: #swchat (Social Workplace Chat, Thursdays 4pm eastern) and #leadershipchat (Tuesdays 8pm eastern).

I will admit, though, that engaging in twitter chats has taken some getting used to. Part of it is obvious and easy. The host asks questions throughout the chat, and then the participants answer them and respond to each other. But when the chat gets large, the volume of tweets grows, and it becomes hard to follow along. Then on top of that, I’m trying to figure out how to respond to a complex conversation in a sentence or two that is less than 140 characters. Here’s how I manage it all to make the most of twitter chats:

Use TweetChat. This is a site where you can log into your twitter account and add the hashtag you’re following and then all you see on the screen is the stream of tweets on that hashtag. You could do the same with a twitter search, but the best part of tweetchat is that it automatically adds the hashtag when you post something. Remember, with each tweet you have to add the hashtag or others on the chat won’t see it.

Strategic RTs. With lots of people saying interesting things, you don’t have to say it all yourself. Re-Tweet (RT) the good ones right when you see them. I find it interesting to watch which tweets get re-tweeted the most. It helps define the flavor of the chat.

Embrace the Constraint. I know it’s hard to say intelligent things in only 140 characters sometimes, but I embrace that constraint rather than feel limited by it. I take more time to post my tweets, because I force myself to be clear using fewer words. I don’t stress out that the question I’m responding to  is no longer visible on the stream. I take the time to get clear. I’ve enjoyed developing this capacity.

Build relationships. Twitter can feel pretty random at times. People follow me every day, and I follow new people every day, and for many of them, I never really get to know them. But the real value of Twitter (learning) is enhanced when the relationships grow, and chats are a great way to get to know people a little better. The people I follow on these chats are often the people I engage with more on a regular basis.

image credit

Get on the Mobile Bandwagon

December 9, 2011

I was at the ASAE Technology conference this week, and from the opening keynote to several of the sessions I attended there was a key theme when it came to association technology: mobile.

I actually lost track of the many different sources on the huge increase in accessing the internet via mobile devices, but I think we’re at the point where if you need the proof, your behind the curve. Use of smart phones is going through the roof. Use of PCs to access the internet in some cases is actually going down. The desktop use won’t go away, of course, but if you’re ignoring how your web presence interacts with mobile devices, you’re in trouble.

But the point about mobile internet use that really stuck out for me came from the opening keynote, delivered by Luke Wroblewski. He pointed out that the constraint of a smaller screen has required web designers to have some discipline in their design. They have to limit what they show, forcing them to focus on what matters. This is Southwest Airline’s home page on the web:

A little distracting and all over the place, don’t you think? And this is what their mobile version looks like:

Let me be honest. I like the mobile one. I like that it just gives me what I need. I like that it doesn’t give me a lot of choices. In fact, as a general theme, I’m growing tired of choices. The institutions that will gain my loyalty are the ones who are both smart enough and bold enough to offer me fewer choices.

That’s no easy task. Offering fewer choices requires some really brutal clarity. That’s something that many organizations simply don’t have the discipline to achieve. But given the explosion in mobile use, I think we all better get on the clarity bandwagon too.

Recap of #ASAE11

August 11, 2011

Well another ASAE Annual Meeting is in the books. As usual, I had a phenomenally good time hanging out with friends from all over the country that I typically only get to see at ASAE events. Here’s a quick post of highlights from the event before I get too deep in digging out from five days out of the office.

ASAE Listened

ASAE caught some flack after Los Angeles last year and they had an important choice. They could have written off the complaints as coming from people who “don’t get it,” and kept doing things exactly as they had done them, or they could have listened, owned up to the fact that some of their choices weren’t right, and try different things this year. Fortunately, they chose the latter path. There were more sessions. There were fewer General Sessions and they were more about content than association business. They added deep dive sessions. They added a room where anyone could sign up to do an unofficial session. Maddie and I did a conversation on the last day with about 15 people on the Humanize book there. Even little things, like moving the Online Engagement Lounge to nearly the very center of where the sessions were (last year it was way off in a corner) made a big difference. Some of these changes were subtle, but the fact that they listened-and showed us that–is very important. Thank you, ASAE.

Good Content

You never know what you’re going to get with content at an ASAE meeting. The same is true for all our meetings, I think. It’s hard to know which sessions are going to be great ahead of time. So maybe I just got lucky this year, but I had NO sessions that let me down content-wise. And judging by the tweets, the OTHER sessions I wanted to go to in each block looked pretty good too. Joe Gerstandt’s Freak Flag Session was phenomenal. His insight about the power of authenticity really hit home. When you make people leave parts of themselves at home before they come to work, you get, well, less of them at work. The “What Innovation Looks Like Here” panel with Chris Busky, Mark Anderson, Dave Zepponi and Mark Nelson was truly inspiring. It was great to hear of associations who were investing in new possibilities, creating new lines of business, and doing things most decidedly NOT the way they had always done them. Shelly and Mark Alcorn’s session on the power of language led to some very interesting table discussions about what our most basic association terms really mean to us–and some of the challenges of coming up with new ways to describe what we do. Honestly, I don’t usually have THAT many sessions that are that good.

YAP is Just an Acronym

I had several different experiences related to “Young” Association Professionals this year. As usual, the YAP party on Monday night was a big hit. We packed a lot of people into into Jive and Wail, a dueling pianos bar a couple of blocks from the Convention Center. I left “early” (about 1 am) and we all had a great time. Also as usual, it wasn’t only people who would count as “young,” necessarily. But what really blew me away this year was the generosity. One of the central figures in our YAP community is KiKi L’Italien, and her hometown is Joplin, Missouri, which as everyone knows was devastated by tornadoes this year. So we decided to add a fundraising twist to the YAP party this year. Not a huge campaign–just asking people to make small cash donations at the party. We made a few announcements and literaly passed a bucket around for people to drop a $5 or $10 bill in.

Except a couple of people (literally) dropped $100 bills in. And there was a fat stack of $20s too. And by the end of the night, we had raised…get this…$1,318 in cash. YAP had already committed to match $1,000 in donations, and now an anonymous donor has stepped in to match the other $318, so our total donation is going to be more than $2,600. Way to go, YAPstars. Thank you everyone for stepping up and helping out.

My other experience with young professionals was in facilitating a Young Association Executives “Town Hall” during one of the sessions. We probably had about 40 or 50 people there, and about one third self-identified as NOT young. They broke into table discussions on topics like, finance, getting involved in ASAE, career development, and generational differences. The conversations were fantastic, and it reinforced what I said prior to the session in the “Daily Now” publication on site: the qualifier of “young” in “young association executive” is more distracting than helpful. They are simply association executives, and when we put them in the “young” box, I think we tend to discount what they bring to the table. Their insight and understanding were impressive. And even better, they had lots of questions. They were curious. They didn’t assume they already knew the answer. It is amazing how questions and openness can fuel a fantastic conversation. But if everyone around the table already knows the answer (I’ve seen conversations like that at ASAE events), the conversation is usually less rich. So maybe we shouldn’t even mention that the Y in YAP and YAE stands for Young. Let’s just invite them into the conversation and see where it goes.

Book Writing v. Blog Writing

June 27, 2011

Okay, I haven’t been posting here as often as I should, but it’s because I’ve been a bit pre-occupied with writing a book. Maddie Grant and I are in the final editing stages of a book called Humanize: How People-Centric Organizations Succeed in a Social World. The book was born out of conversations that Maddie and I were having for about a year, both online and offline, about the “social organization.” Social media is a big deal for organizations, but not just for marketing and communications. It is changing the way we run our organizations.

But as we started writing the book, we realized it’s not really even about social media. Social media just shines a light on the fact that we have been running our organizations like machines for at least a century, and that is no longer serving us. We argue that being human–being open, trustworthy, generative, and courageous–was one of the keys to the success of social media. More importantly, though, those elements also provide a set of organizing principles that can guide the way we run our organizations that is much more powerful than the status quo.

In the book we dig into each element in detail, discussing how human organizations address each issue at the levels of culture, process, and individual behavior. Once the book is out (in September), we will also have a set of worksheets that you can download–one for each of the four main chapters on open, trustworthy, generative, and courageous–to help you get started changing things, no matter where you are in the organization.

The book is available for pre-order now, and we do have the book website set up (though the worksheets won’t be there until September) at www.humanizebook.com. And I promise now that the book is done, I’ll have more time for blogging!

Social Media Policies

April 28, 2011

Interesting conversation this morning on the ASAE Executive Management Listserv about social media policies. It seems a consultant to an association said something on his personal Facebook page that the Board didn’t like one of the questions put to the list was, should the consultant be fired? Was it actually a violation of policies? Could it be objectively considered poor judgment? Interesting conversation.

And one of the follow up questions was, what is your association’s social media policy? Um, that’s assuming you have one. I posted the link to the SocialFish white paper on the subject. It’s a good read. We’re actually in the process here of developing policies, and I’ll report back on it when we’re done.

Anyone out there who’s already done policies have any insights to share?

Are You Still Collecting Dues?

March 29, 2011

There was an interesting conversation today on the twitter-based Association Chat (with the snicker-laden hashtag on Twitter of #assnchat) that was putting in question the membership model for associations. There is a good article by Erin Fuller in Associations Now on the topic as well, and there was a great session at the Great Ideas conference on the topic just a few weeks ago. Of course a few months ago the association blogosphere was quite busy discussing  Joe Flowers’ public declaration to not renew ASAE dues. I had a post in that flurry about “just what are we joining.”

There, that should keep you reading for a while!

But also check out the twitter stream on today’s conversation (search for assnchat on twitter and scroll down; it was an active discussion). There was a lot of back and forth, though I’d say most were supportive of the idea of dues becoming less important, and there was support for the “freemium” model where basic membership is free, but you can upgrade to get more service.

I thought it was interesting that there were questions about how the organization would “pay” for getting rid of dues. Do you raise prices on other things? How will we “fund operations” without dues? Comments like me make me raise my eyebrow a little. What do you mean how do we “fund operations” without dues? You fund operations with revenue. Dues is a kind of revenue. But that question almost sounds like you HAVE to have dues simply because you have “operations.” That implied sense of entitlement is one that that bugs me in the dues conversation.  It’s circular. We have to collect dues, because if we didn’t, how could we pay people to collect the dues?

Now, I know no one literally thinks that, but I do think the comments I saw are evidence that our community needs to shake up its thinking about dues and membership. Here was my only comment in the discussion:

 

 

 

To be clear, I’m not anti-dues, and I do think there are plenty of places where we should charge them and members will gladly pay because they get such clear value out of belonging. But it’s not to pay for operations, because in today’s decentralized world, centralized operations don’t have as much default value as they used to. So what’s the trend out there folks (particularly my AMC brethren)? Are dues on the way out?

Awesome Blog Takeover

March 5, 2011

Check out the very cool “takeover” of ASAE’s already very cool Acronym blog by the Young Association Executives. It is a project of the YAE Committee, and in full disclosure, I did some work with them over the last year (though not about the blog takeover), so I am already a fan of this group. Thanks, Aaron Wolowiec, for the kind words about my work in your post during the takeover.

I have a couple of different reactions. First, as an expert on generational diversity, I want to point something out. Young people are smart. They know how to write. They know how to think. They understand organizations, and they have a lot to contribute. The posts on Acronym make that clear, though I did not need convincing. Unfortunately, I think too many people do need convincing. I hear it when I talk on the subject–people complaining that young people don’t know how to write or can’t articulate clearly. Honestly I find examples of that across all generations.

Second, I love this tactic for a blog. One truism for blogs is that it is good to mix things up. If you write the exact same kind of post, with the same tone, and the same structure, day after day, you’ll likely lose some readers. I am a regular reader of Acronym, but I loved this sudden flurry of new voices. It brought me back to the blog.

Oooh. Shiny. Quora

January 31, 2011

The shiny new social media tool these days is Quora. It is basically a question and answer site. Questions are posted anonymously and answered based on people who have profiles. You can then rate the answers as helpful or not and follow specific people, topics, or individual questions. I signed up and I’ve followed a bunch of people (mostly the people I follow on Twitter), and I’ve browsed some of the topic areas, and even posted one answer. Honestly, I haven’t gotten over the hump yet. Mostly my experience of Quora is in deleting the emails that tell me one of my friends is following me on Quora.

But I think it has serious potential. Maddie said it is awesome over on the SocialFish blog. My gut reaction is that it could eventually be a listserv killer. We in AMCs often set up listservs for clients. For very small organizations, an active listserv where you can post questions to trusted fellow members and get answers is considered really valuable. Except, of course, that you have to deal with all the people who don’t get the digest version and send in ther “me too” posts or accidentally reveal some inconvenient truth to the whole list because they hit reply all…

Quora could give you all the questions and answers, but without the annoyances. And it would be searchable via google, not the ineffective archive search that comes with the listserv. And the value of smarter answers would be demonstrated through the crowd-sourced rating system, rather than the person who has the most time on their hands to post to the listserv all the time.

A lot will need to happen before Quora really kills off association listservs, but I think it’s a service to keep an eye on.

Welcome Julie Hill!

January 11, 2011

We’ve hired a new staff person here at MSP. Julie Hill has joined the team as Marketing Manager. She has many years of experience doing a broad range of marketing and communications functions in the association world, and we are THRILLED to have her here helping MSP and our client associations. A more detailed bio for Julie is on our website.

We’re giving her a bit of time to get settled, but I’m sure you will eventually see her her as a blogger!

Image credit.

The Hard Work of Perspective

November 22, 2010

This week we had a technology crisis with one of our clients. It was resolved fairly quickly, but it inconvenienced quite a few people, and some of them were , shall we say, not restrained in their expression of frustration to the staff and to one of our Board members.

The day it happened I got a draft email from the aforementioned Board member which he asked to be sent out to the membership. Unfortunately, in my opinion, it was an over-reaction. It over-emphasized the problem and went into great detail about the lengths we would go to in order to prevent anything like this from happening again. I had the fun job of telling him we weren’t going to send it out. The next day I sent out a simpler apology email explaining what had happened and what we were doing about it.

The problem here was that this Board member was taking heat. He had a handful of upset people directing their comments to him, so from his perspective, this looked like a big crisis. When we have people in our faces, it is hard to keep perspective on what’s going on. The same is true when staff is answering a slew of phone calls from unhappy people.

So while we definitely need to respond to the people who are in our face, we also simultaneously need to be quickly scanning the rest of the environment to ensure we have some perspective about what’s going on before we take our next big steps. In our case, the number of unhappy people was a very small percentage of the people affected. While each one of them warranted a careful reply and some extra attention, it wasn’t indicative of a huge crisis, so my next step to that larger group was calm and measured and fairly understated. In fact, after that next email, I got a few responses of thanks and people wondering why others were over-reacting.

Keeping perspective means looking at the small picture and the big picture simultaneously. Keeping perspective means being aware of what data you have at your disposal and processing it quickly. Keeping perspective requires the emotional intelligence to not let your brain get “hijacked” in response to highly charged individuals. It’s hard work.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.